Memory Usage
Here’s a chart shows Amberol’s memory footprint compared to a range of other popular open source music players.
We are slightly disappointed with the memory footprint of Amberol. From a selection of music players it comes about midway but many of its peers offer a substantially larger range of features.
Naturally terminal-based music players are the most frugal with termusic, cmus, and our beloved musikcube winning this contest. But even machines with modest RAM shouldn’t struggle with Amerbol’s footprint.
Pages in this article:
Page 1 – Introduction / Installation
Page 2 – In Operation
Page 3 – Memory Usage
Page 4 – Summary
No, you *can’t* drag folders in.