Last Updated on December 24, 2022
Memory Comparison
Here’s a chart showing the memory usage of the 15 Gtk file managers. It’s not a scientific test, but a fairly rough and ready guide using ps_mem. It’s difficult to make reliable comparisons, but we’ve done our best to make the comparison as fair as possible.
Pages in this article:
Page 1 – PCManFM, Files, Double Commander
Page 2 – GNOME Commander, 4Pane, Sunflower
Page 3 – SpaceFM, Thunar, Polo
Page 4 – Tux Commander, Donatella, Files (Elementary)
Page 5 – emelFM2, Gentoo, Rox-Filer
Page 6 – Memory comparison
Page 7 – Summary
Why no mention of Caja and Nemo?
They are mentioned…
Hi Steve. I think they deserve better than just “(and forks)”.
They do, that’s why they have a special mention in the section in question, not merely (and forks).
In general we don’t think it’s a great idea to fork actively maintained high quality software. It’s much better to contribute to the active project than fork.
I think Files (Nautilus) is awful compared to Caja and Nemo. Files has had many features ripped out.
And maybe in a future article you could cover non-GTK/non-QT window managers including XFE which uses the Fox widget library.
We’ve already covered XFE in File managers article, but there are other good non-GTK/non-QT file managers, so yes, we will.
Hey folks. Thanks for mentioning Sunflower. Development has been stale for a bit due to my personal life and work taking most of my free time. However in the background I’ve been preparing new release for a while now, which will be based on GTK+ 3.20. This release will have better and simpler interface but without removing any of the existing features. It will be much faster and better optimized.
If you need any help in testing your new release let us know. And when it’s ready, we’ll be happy to reevaluate.
my favorites are Thunar and Caja, even they’re not perfect. nowadays I’m more than a terminal based FM guy though, I use Midnight Commander a lot.